Though not remotely surprising, it is disappointing Stockton Council has arranged the meeting at their convenience, ignoring the fact this will deny hundreds of residents from being able to attend the meeting and have their say.
I have copied the text of my open letter to the chairman of the Appeals and Complaints Committee, Labour councillor David Wilburn, below asking for the meeting to be rearranged to suit the thousands of concerned residents and traders, not just the dozen or so councillors and officers of Stockton Council.
Should you wish to forward your own thoughts to Councillor Wilburn, you can do so by e-mailing him at david.wilburn@stockton.gov.uk
Tuesday 20th August 2013
Dear Mr Wilburn
I am writing
to you in your capacity as chairman of the Council’s Appeals and Complaints
Committee.
As you will already be aware, a meeting of the Appeals
and Complaints Committee has been arranged for Tuesday 10th
September at the Baptist Tabernacle in Stockton to consider the objections to
the various Traffic Regulations Orders (TROs) proposed for Yarm High Street and
the surrounding area.
I am sure I need not describe the extent and depth of
concern felt by many residents, traders and visitors to Yarm. Indeed, whilst
consideration of parking matters (and even the possible imposition of parking charges)
regarding Norton High Street are not as far advanced as here in Yarm, I am sure
you will be able to empathize with our concerns.
I am therefore extremely concerned that, given the number
of people who will doubtless wish to attend and address the meeting, the
committee is due to meet at a time and venue which seems tailored towards the
convenience of councillors and council officers rather than that of residents.
Given individuals’ work and/or childcare commitments, I
fear large numbers of people are to be denied the opportunity to attend the
meeting if it is held during the working day. Whilst ordinarily it may
reasonably be suggested that individuals could take a day’s leave from work
thereby allowing them to attend, coming so soon after the school holidays this
may well not be possible for many (for example, those who have needed to
utilise their annual leave in order to care for their children during the
holidays).
In addition, I was surprised that a venue closer to, or
preferably within, Yarm was not secured. From both a convenience to residents
and an environmental point of view, it would make infinitely more sense for 30
or so councillors and officers to commute to Yarm for the meeting rather than
hundreds of individuals having to travel to Stockton Town Centre.
I would therefore ask that you, as the committee
chairman, have the meeting rearranged for a time more convenient to residents
and at a venue in Yarm.
It is not unusual for the venue of meetings to be set in
order to accommodate members of the public – hence why the meeting was arranged
to be held at the Tabernacle in the first place, as have many planning meetings
recently which you and I have both attended. It is also typical for meetings
relating only to a single ward to be held in that particular ward.
As for the time of the meeting, I see no reason why this
could not be held either during the evening or on a weekend, thereby allowing
individuals to attend who otherwise would not be able to due to work
commitments. Again, this is not unusual
– many public consultation events are held at such a time with the sole aim
being to maximise the attendance of those who wish to do so.
I accept some may argue that the likely duration of the
meeting means it is impractical to be held on an evening, but as there are
three separate TROs to be considered it would be perfectly possible – perhaps
even preferable – to hold two meetings to consider these. The most
controversial TRO relating to parking charges could be considered at one
meeting, and the remaining orders at the subsequent meeting. I appreciate this
suggestion would be out of the ordinary, but as the committee has met on just 6
occasions during the past two years, I don’t consider I am asking for an
intolerable burden to be brought to bear on committee members.
I would cite just one recent example (though could
provide many more if required) to demonstrate when the council has arranged a
meeting that would meet both of my requests. A meeting was held at Levendale
Primary School in Yarm between 19:00 and 21:00 to discuss the possibility of a
new cycleway in Yarm – the time and venue were set as such purely to meet the
needs of residents.
I see no reason why similar arrangements could not be
made to hold the meeting(s) on an evening in Yarm, with Conyers School
appearing to be a suitable venue both in terms of size, ease of access and
parking provision.
I hope you will be able to accede to my request and I
look forward to hearing from you.
Yours sincerely,